- Chanel Patent Red Ballerina Flats
- Chloe Deep Coffee Handbag
- Christian Louboutin Red Metallic Simple Pumps
- Bally Patent Patent Red Jana Tote
- Chloe Red Handbag
- Herve Leger Grey Bandage Skirt
- Gucci Blue Messenger Bag
- Hermes Blue Shoulder Bag
- Jimmy Choo Black Tassel Bag
- Louis Vuitton Suhali Leather Grey Lockit PM
- Louis Vuitton Monogram Idylle Speedy 30
- Herve Leger Orange Sleeveless Bandage Dress
- Louis Vuitton Monogram Canvas Pegase 55
- Louis Vuitton Monogram Vernis Purple Coin Purse
- Dior Homme White Low Top Sneakers
- Chanel Pink Ballerina Flats
- Louis Vuitton Damier Azur Canvas Totally GM
- Chloe Wheat Handbag
- Marc Jacobs Golden Mouse Flats
- Louis Vuitton Monogram Multicolore Eugenie Wallet
- Herve Leger Yellow Bandage Dress
- Chanel White Ballerina Flats
- Chloe Light Coffee Paddington Wallet
- Louis Vuitton Monogram Vernis Red Heart Coin Bag
- Lanvin Golden Ballerina Flats
- Alexander Wang Black Rocco Mini Duffle
- Louis Vuitton Monogram Leopard Stephen
- Givenchy Coffee Shoulder Bag
- Chanel Green Quilted Flap Bag
- Fendi Sky Blue Zucca Spy Bag
- Gucci Apricot Babouska Medium Boston Bag
- Jimmy Choo Deep Coffee Crystal Star Bag
- Givenchy Royal Blue Melancholy Tote
- Cartier Red Shopping Bag
- Loewe Yellow Handbag
- Jimmy Choo Patent Blue Zero Sandals
- Cartier Black Shopping Bag
- Marni White Handbag
- Christian Louboutin Lady Bow Slingbacks
- Gucci Yellow Cruise Joy Handbag
- Louis Vuitton Monogram Vernis White Brentwood
- Louis Vuitton Monogram Miroir Silver Speedy 30
- Cartier Red Shoulder Bag
- Manolo Blahnik Black BB
- Jimmy Choo Red Perforated Ornament Zulu Clutch
- Giuseppe Zanotti Multi Buckled Boots for Balmain
- Alexander Wang Black Donna Hobo
- Marc Jacobs Deep Coffee Keylock Shoulder Bag
- Louis Vuitton Mahina Leather Deep Coffee Lunar GM
- Dior Homme Black Loafers
Overpopulation or Be Fruitful and Multiply March 7. 2006
Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Your final paragraph contains a leap that I cannot comprehend. I agree with the entire post, through the sentence, "The world's population is approximately 6.6 billion people." After that, you seem to have some information that I don't.
The logic follows as such:
God says, "If I let you have sex... you have to help me create "order of harmony" in the world...."
Overpopulation (making babies) creates disorder of harmony with creation
Therefore, making babies has to stop but not sex because that is a blessing given by God.
Having sex and making babies are two different things
God says, "If I let you have sex... you have to help me create "order of harmony" in the world...."
Overpopulation (making babies) creates disorder of harmony with creation
Therefore, making babies has to stop but not sex because that is a blessing given by God.
Having sex and making babies are two different things
"Overpopulation (making babies)" is the leap I'm not following. The notion that we are in fact experiencing overpopulation, presented as an obvious fact.
Before I start... how do you understand the concept of overpopulation?
I believe sex, love and reproduction are different. But, it's hard to discuss.
Evandro
http://evandro.net/
http://evandro.net/tiss/
http://evandro.net/pagerank/google.html
http://www.poker-texas.com/
http://www.casinopokerforum.com/
Evandro
http://evandro.net/
http://evandro.net/tiss/
http://evandro.net/pagerank/google.html
http://www.poker-texas.com/
http://www.casinopokerforum.com/
Thanks but it's only a very brief overview.... it needs much more attention as is apparent in the questioning of the above commenter.
I wouldn't consider homosexuality a form of birthcontrol. Just because someone is homosexual, it doesn't remove the desire to be a parent. Homosexuals have many options when it comes to children. They can adopt, which wouldn't add to the population... but there is also always the possibility of a surrogate parent. There is ALWAYS the great possibility for childbirth in homosexuality. To call it a form of birth control is ignorance.
Thank you for your words of consideration. The hyperbolic rhetoric of the statement was it's own intent. The key to understanding what I meant is to keep in mind that sexual relations and birth control are completely separate issues. In a non-clinical situation homosexual sex does not produce offspring. This is not to say the homosexual doesn't want babies but rather biology precludes it. Or in the vernacular, "Butt-Babies Don't Live."
You also indicate a belief in a hope of homosexual reproductivity. This is a hope shared by many and one that should not be taken lightly as it would be a wonderful miracle if it did happen. It is not what happens now though... so if butt-babies do start to live the logic in the exegesis would be that homosexuals would have to stop reproducing as well.
sex and reproduction are separate.
You also indicate a belief in a hope of homosexual reproductivity. This is a hope shared by many and one that should not be taken lightly as it would be a wonderful miracle if it did happen. It is not what happens now though... so if butt-babies do start to live the logic in the exegesis would be that homosexuals would have to stop reproducing as well.
sex and reproduction are separate.


